8 best Greenhouse alternatives in 2026
Looking for an alternative to Greenhouse? These 8 tools do the same job with a different focus. Each one is compared on who it suits, its key features, pros and cons, and what it really costs next to Greenhouse.
Why teams look for an alternative to Greenhouse
- Limited customization, especially in reporting and scheduling.
- Steep learning curve and some functionality gaps.
- Small teams that need a published price or a self-serve start.
- Buyers who want heavy report and scheduling customization out of the box (a common review complaint)
From Greenhouse's published plan limits and recurring themes in public reviews. See the Greenhouse review for the full picture.
Greenhouse alternatives at a glance
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan or trial |
|---|---|---|---|
 Greenhouse Current | Mid-size and enterprise teams that want structured interviews, scorecards and deep integrations. | Contact sales | No |
 Lever | Teams that want ATS and sourcing CRM in one tool. | Contact sales | No |
 Ashby | Startups up to 100 employees wanting one published monthly price. | $400/month (All-In-One Foundations, up to 100 employees) | No |
 SmartRecruiters | High-volume and mid-market to enterprise hiring. | Starting at $14,995 (Essential), unit/period not stated | No |
 iCIMS | Large employers with complex high-volume hiring. | Contact sales | No |
 Workable | Small and mid-size teams that want a published price and a 15-day trial. | $299/mo (Standard, monthly billing) | Free trial |
 BambooHR | Small and mid-size US companies that want HRIS first and light recruiting in the same system. | $250/mo flat (Core, 25 or fewer employees); $10 to $10.25 per employee per month above that | No |
 Zoho Recruit | Small teams and agencies that want a per-recruiter price with a free one-job plan. | Free (1 active job); paid plans from about $25 per user per month billed annually per third-party sources | Free plan, Free trial |
 JazzHR | Small businesses that want a published annual price. | $1,000/yr (Hero, billed annually) | No |
The 8 best Greenhouse alternatives
Lever
Combined ATS and recruiting CRM from Employ, sold on quote-only pricing with AI screening and interview summaries.
Lever is a combined ATS and recruiting CRM from Employ, sold by quote with AI screening and interview summaries. It stands out for putting sourcing and tracking in one tool and for well-organized candidate management that saves recruiters time.
- Best for
- Teams that want ATS and sourcing CRM in one tool.
- Company size
- Positioned by third-party research as the 'scalable hiring' tier in Employ's lineup (mid-size)
Key features
- Resume parsing and screening
- AI screening included in core platform per vendor.
Pros
- Well-organized candidate management.
- Automation saves recruiter time.
Cons
- Pausing or moving candidates can feel complicated.
- Customer support and customization limits, plus integration issues.
Pricing: Contact sales
Ashby
All-in-one ATS, scheduling, sourcing and analytics platform popular with fast-growing tech companies, priced $400/month for startups up to 100 employees.
Ashby is an all-in-one applicant tracking system with scheduling, sourcing and analytics, popular with fast-growing tech companies. It stands out for a published flat price by company size and a customizable workflow, though SSO and advanced scheduling cost extra.
- Best for
- Startups up to 100 employees wanting one published monthly price.
- Company size
- Startups to enterprise; Foundations up to 100 employees.
Key features
- Resume parsing and screening
- AI credits: 1,500/month on Foundations.
- Interview scheduling
- Advanced Scheduling is a paid add-on.
- Careers page and candidate experience
- Up to 5 brands on Foundations, unlimited on Plus and Enterprise.
Pros
- Easy to use and efficient for recruiting teams.
- Responsive, knowledgeable support.
- Broad feature set and customizable workflows.
Cons
- Reporting and data volume can feel overwhelming.
- A few reviewers find the interface unintuitive.
Pricing: $400/month (All-In-One Foundations, up to 100 employees)
SmartRecruiters
Enterprise-leaning ATS now owned by SAP, with a published entry price of $14,995 and quote-only higher tiers.
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise-leaning ATS owned by SAP, with a published entry price of $14,995 and quote-only higher tiers. It stands out for high-volume hiring, a smooth application process and compatibility with SAP SuccessFactors.
- Best for
- High-volume and mid-market to enterprise hiring.
- Company size
- G2 reviewers note high-volume hiring fit.
Key features
- HRIS and background check integrations
- Interoperable with SAP SuccessFactors and other HCM suites (SAP statement)
Pros
- Smooth candidate application process.
- Works for high-volume hiring.
Cons
- Trails rivals on overall G2 score.
Pricing: Starting at $14,995 (Essential), unit/period not stated
iCIMS
Enterprise talent acquisition suite, privately held, with no public prices and separate implementation fees.
iCIMS is an enterprise talent acquisition suite sold by quote with separate implementation fees. It stands out for recruiting efficiency and reporting in large organizations with complex high-volume hiring, though reviewers describe a steep learning curve.
- Best for
- Large employers with complex high-volume hiring.
- Company size
- Enterprise and mid-market (third-party)
Pros
- Recruiting efficiency.
- Reporting.
Cons
- Limited customization.
- Steep learning curve.
- Slow support response.
Pricing: Contact sales
Workable
Recruiting platform with published monthly prices by company-size tier and AI credit packs for sourcing and screening.
Workable is a recruiting platform with published monthly prices by company-size tier, and AI credit packs for sourcing and screening. It stands out for a user-friendly interface, quick setup, and video interviews and assessments bundled into higher tiers.
- Best for
- Small and mid-size teams that want a published price and a 15-day trial.
- Company size
- 1 to 1000+ employees, priced by tier.
Key features
- Resume parsing and screening
- AI screening credits: 1 credit per candidate screened; 3,000 free credits on paid accounts.
Pros
- Intuitive, user-friendly interface.
- Quick to set up.
Cons
- Not confirmed from review text in this research.
Pricing: $299/mo (Standard, monthly billing) · Free trial
BambooHR
Per-employee HRIS for small and mid-size US companies with a built-in ATS capped by job openings per tier.
BambooHR is an HRIS for small and mid-size US companies with a built-in applicant tracking system, capped by open jobs per tier. It stands out for a clean interface, fast onboarding and a flat monthly rate for teams of 25 or fewer.
- Best for
- Small and mid-size US companies that want HRIS first and light recruiting in the same system.
- Company size
- Small to mid-size; flat rates tuned to 25 or fewer employees.
Pros
- Clean interface and easy navigation.
- Fast, straightforward onboarding and good support scores.
Cons
- Limited features and weak customization.
- Reporting and approval options feel thin.
Pricing: $250/mo flat (Core, 25 or fewer employees); $10 to $10.25 per employee per month above that
Zoho Recruit
Low-cost, per-recruiter ATS from Zoho with a free tier and separate staffing-agency and corporate HR editions.
Zoho Recruit is a per-recruiter ATS with a free one-job tier and separate editions for staffing agencies and corporate HR. It stands out for low pricing, built-in interview scheduling and a close fit with other Zoho apps.
- Best for
- Small teams and agencies that want a per-recruiter price with a free one-job plan.
- Company size
- G2 reviewers are 81.8% small business.
Key features
- Job multiposting
- Free job boards on Free plan; premium job boards from Standard.
- Pipeline and hiring-team collaboration
- Candidate management, email management and talent pipeline; assignment rules from Professional.
- Resume parsing and screening
- Resume management from Standard; AI candidate matching, screening and assessments from Professional.
- Interview scheduling
- Interview scheduling included even on Free plan; video interviews are a paid add-on.
Pros
- Broad toolset that covers the full recruiting process.
- Low price versus enterprise ATS.
- Ease of use scored about 8.5 of 10 on G2.
Cons
- Third-party roundups disagree on job limits and price, so plan details are confusing.
- Premium support is a separate paid add-on.
Pricing: Free (1 active job); paid plans from about $25 per user per month billed annually per third-party sources · Free plan, Free trial
JazzHR
Low-cost annual-plan ATS for small businesses, with a stated eligibility cap of about 250 employees.
JazzHR is a low-cost applicant tracking system for small businesses, sold on annual plans by job volume. It stands out for ease of use and quick setup, but standard pricing excludes companies above roughly 250 employees.
- Best for
- Small businesses that want a published annual price.
- Company size
- Small business; standard pricing excludes companies over 250 employees.
Key features
- Job multiposting
- Premium listings and syndication to more job boards available; posting limits by plan.
Pros
- Easy to use.
- Quick, simple implementation.
Cons
- Customization options are limited.
Pricing: $1,000/yr (Hero, billed annually)
How to choose a Greenhouse alternative
Start with what made you look: a missing feature, a team that outgrew the plan or a bill that grew faster than the team. Then compare the shortlist on the points that matter most for this kind of software.
- Job multiposting: Posting to many boards from one place saves recruiter time and widens reach.
- Pipeline and hiring-team collaboration: Scorecards and shared feedback keep managers aligned.
- Resume parsing and screening: Parsing and knockout questions cut manual review.
- Interview scheduling: Calendar sync removes back-and-forth with candidates.
- HRIS and background check integrations: Smooth handoff to onboarding and payroll avoids re-entry.
- Careers page and candidate experience: Affects application rates and employer brand.
What the alternatives cost compared with Greenhouse
Greenhouse does not publish a per-user price that can be compared directly, so the table shows each vendor's own pricing basis.
| Tool | Starting price | Per seat per month | Pricing model | 20 users per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | Contact sales | Not published | custom | Not published |
| BambooHR | $250/mo flat (Core, 25 or fewer employees); $10 to $10.25 per employee per month above that | $10 to $10.25 per employee per month (Core); flat $250/mo if 25 or fewer. | per employee | Not published |
| Zoho Recruit | Free (1 active job); paid plans from about $25 per user per month billed annually per third-party sources | About $25 per user per month annual (Standard); third-party figure, not confirmed by the vendor. | per user | $6,000 |
| Workable | $299/mo (Standard, monthly billing) | Not published | flat (by employee-count tier) | Not published |
| Ashby | $400/month (All-In-One Foundations, up to 100 employees) | Not published | flat (by company size tier) | Not published |
| JazzHR | $1,000/yr (Hero, billed annually) | Not published | flat | Not published |
| SmartRecruiters | Starting at $14,995 (Essential), unit/period not stated | Not published | custom | Not published |
| Lever | Contact sales | Not published | custom | Not published |
| iCIMS | Contact sales | Not published | custom | Not published |
When to stay with Greenhouse
- Mid-size and enterprise teams that want structured interviews, scorecards and deep integrations.
- Companies that need an audit log and configurable session time-outs (Pro tier only)
Greenhouse alternatives: frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to Greenhouse?
Lever is the closest alternative for most teams: teams that want ATS and sourcing CRM in one tool. Ashby suits teams that startups up to 100 employees wanting one published monthly price.
Is there a free alternative to Greenhouse?
Zoho Recruit offers a free plan. Free plans usually cap users, features or history, so check the limits against your team size.