Omnea vs Zip (2026): features, pricing and which to choose
Omnea and Zip compared on what they do, who they suit, their key features, pros and cons, and what each costs for your team, with every fact checked on October 24, 2026.
Omnea or Zip: the short answer
Choose Omnea if
- Mid-size and large companies with a lot of indirect spend and many stakeholders.
- Teams wanting employees to request purchases through Slack or Teams.
- Companies that want intake plus sourcing and supplier risk in one tool.
Choose Zip if
- Mid-market and enterprise teams routing all spend requests through one intake.
- Teams on SAP, Oracle, Workday or NetSuite-style ERPs needing PO and approval handoff.
What are Omnea and Zip?
Omnea
Omnea is an AI-native procurement platform from London that runs intake, approvals, sourcing, contracts, POs and supplier risk. Requests can start in Slack or Teams, and reviewers praise the customizable workflow builder.
Zip
Zip is a procurement orchestration platform that covers intake, approvals, POs, payments, sourcing, contracts and supplier onboarding. It targets mid-market and enterprise teams and offers guided intake and an AI concierge.
Omnea vs Zip: features compared
| Omnea | Zip | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-native procurement platform from London that runs intake, approvals, sourcing, contracts, POs and supplier risk, with Slack and Teams request entry. | Procurement orchestration platform covering intake, approvals, POs, payments, sourcing, contracts and supplier onboarding for mid-market and enterprise. |
| Best for | Mid-size and large companies with a lot of indirect spend and many stakeholders. | Mid-market and enterprise teams routing all spend requests through one intake. |
| Software request intake | Unified and conversational intake via Slack, Teams and MCP. | Intake-to-Procure with Slack, Teams, Gmail, Outlook entry. |
| Approval routing | Intake and approvals with configurable human oversight and audit trail; Context Engine learns from past approvals and rejections. | Policy-based routing (vendor description) |
| Negotiation / benchmarks | Autonomous Sourcing agent; vendor claims 4.2% average annual indirect savings. | Not published |
| ERP / finance / SSO integrations | Vendor claims 200+ integrations across ERPs, CLMs and GRCs; a G2 reviewer mentions SAP and Conga. | SAP S/4HANA, Oracle, Workday, Ariba, DocuSign, Ironclad, OneTrust, EcoVadis. |
| Request forms | Dynamic intake; configuration detail not published. | Guided intake and App Studio. |
| Workflow orchestration | Customizable workflow builder (G2 reviewers) | Cross-team routing. |
| Slack / Teams entry | Slack, Teams, MCP. | Slack and Teams. |
| AI triage | AI agents, Context Engine, supplier data from Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot. | AI Procurement Concierge, Superagents, MCP. |
| ERP / P2P connectors | 200+ integrations claimed; ERPs not named on homepage. | SAP S/4HANA, Oracle, Workday. |
| Implementation time | Not stated by vendor; one G2 reviewer was live within a couple of weeks. | Not published |
| Starting price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| G2 rating | 4.8 (60 reviews) | 4.6 (137 reviews) |
Pros and cons
Omnea
Pros
- Hands-on implementation team.
- Highly customizable workflow builder.
Cons
- Reviewers want more self-service integration setup.
Zip
Pros
- Ease of use, intuitive design.
- Workflow automation reduces manual chasing.
Cons
- NetSuite integration issues cited.
- Limits in customization and admin features.
Omnea vs Zip pricing
Omnea starts at Contact sales and Zip at Contact sales. The pricing bases differ, so compare the full quote for your team rather than the entry price.
| Omnea | Zip | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | custom | custom |
| Billing | Quote. | Quote. |
Differences most comparisons miss
Worth knowing about Omnea
- Vendor claims 45% faster intake-to-PO cycle times and 96% of spend through compliant channels; these are self-reported.
- Models run under zero data retention agreements and are not trained on customer data, per the vendor.
- Raised a $50M Series B in September 2025 led by Insight Partners and Khosla Ventures.
- Positions as full source-to-pay, but customers like Just Eat and Spotify named by vendor are enterprise-scale.
Worth knowing about Zip
- Vendor homepage lists SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and the EU-US Data Privacy Framework.
- Series D led by BOND at a $2.2B valuation, up from $1.5B in 2023.
- Homepage mentions no negotiation service or marketplace, so it is a workflow tool, not a buying service.
- Implementation support runs through an Enterprise Transformation Office and certified partners; no timeline published.
Omnea vs Zip: frequently asked questions
Which is better, Omnea or Zip?
It depends on the team. Omnea is the stronger pick for mid-size and large companies with a lot of indirect spend and many stakeholders, while Zip suits mid-market and enterprise teams routing all spend requests through one intake. Compare the feature rows above against your must-haves before you look at price.
Do Omnea and Zip support SAML single sign-on?
Omnea: listed as a security feature on homepage; plan not stated. Zip: not stated on its public pages. Confirm the plan in writing before you compare prices.
Sources
Both columns use the same sources: vendor pricing and product pages, documentation, G2 and company records, checked on October 24, 2026. Full source lists are on the Omnea and Zip reviews.